Risk management before and after the Credit Crunch: how will the crisis change the theory and the practice of investment risk management?

Author(s): Stewart Hodges, Cass Business School

 

Stewart Hodges, Professor of Finance at Cass Business School (Go to Stewart Hodges's Cass Experts entry).

Some risk models failed badly during the credit crunch. Numerous commentators, including Lord Turner in his March 2009 Review, have raised fundamental questions about the validity of Value at Risk (VaR) as a measure of risk. This talk reviews the lessons from the credit crunch. Not all models performed badly but many did, and for a variety of different reasons. Some pitfalls are easily avoided; for example, reliance of Normal distributions estimated from short histories of data. Issues considered will include: good and bad VaR methods, stress testing, aspects of operational risk, liquidity exposure, the limitations to measuring risk, and which techniques seem important and which can we probably discard.

Article attachments

Click on the attachment icons to download or open.
TypeTitle
File: Risk management before and after the Credit Crunch - presentationRisk management before and after the Credit Crunch - presentation
Extension: pdf | Size: 254.43 KB
Video: CFA Masterclass - audio podcastCFA Masterclass - audio podcast

Article tags

risk models, credit crunch, measuring risk, Stewart Hodges

Rate this article

Sign in or Register to rate this article (Current rating: Not yet rated | Views: 545)

Leave a comment

This article has 0 comment(s)

Only registered users can post comments or rate articles. Please Sign in or Register.