Chris Rowley
-
Professor of HRM, Cass Business School, City University, London, UK and Director of Centre for Research in Asian Management and Research and Publications, HEAD Foundation, Singapore
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) was once an exotic interest and
ambition of 'alternative thinkers' and corporate 'do-gooders'. It is now
commonplace and it is almost impossible to find organisations, especially
multinational companies, not expressing a CSR commitment. Websites are replete
with such phrases as "a desire to put something back", "committed to being a
global citizen", "investing in communities", etc. The wording may be slightly
different, but the themes remain somewhat constant - we may be giant
organisations, even involved in not very environmentally-friendly operations,
but we care for more than just our profits and bottom line. Companies not only
have CSR statements, but also managers and can be based in various parts of
organisations, including as separate units or in PR and HR departments.
CSR can be known by a variety of other names and terms, such as corporate
responsibility, corporate citizenship and a mix of terms such as responsible,
sustainable and ethical business. CSR is a nebulous and elastic concept than
can mean very different things to various people and constituencies. It is also
one of those 'motherhood and apple pie' concepts, seen as, a priori 'a good
thing'. After all, not many organisations would propound that they did not have
any CSR. As such, it is one of the most popular, fashionable areas of
management today.